Then the doctor spent all of 3 minutes on me.
He and his nurse were exhausted and so was I.
I had to tell them everything.
LOL I came home with six samples of shampoo since the pharma and medicaid decided to change the prescription to something that was harmful, made my scalp break out and shed large parts of scalp. Yeah that's right my scalp was red so now make it break out and peel off. Nice work losers.
I asked about the reaction to the surgical tape. He said there are way too many ingredients in it to bother with.
LOL latex, adhesive, those are starters and they are important.
http://www.health.state.ny.us/environmental/indoors/food_safety/latex/latex2.htm
Its of note that medicaid pays this doctor only $16. Their related health care provider gets paid $125. Lol when you don't play the game with them you lose.
Actually the patient, me, loses. I had to wear that patch with surgical tape for two days and the whole time my back was red and itching. The provider didn't know anything about it. They did not wash it off. I had to go another four days until I could wash it off.
Their response igh. I said didn't you see the red holes it left. You scratched they said. I did not even touch it. A scratch won't make those. You are very sensitive they said.
LOL so sensitive that I was only allergic to PPD.
"p-Phenylenediamine (PPD) is an organic compound with the formula C6H4(NH2)2. This derivative of aniline, aromatic amine, is a colourless solid when pure but typically samples are partially oxidized and appear yellowish. It mainly used as a component of engineering polymers and composites. Its use is controversial because of it high toxicity. may cause allergic reactions, which makes it a controversial chemical to be included in hair dyes."
also see: http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/20267
PPD is an aromatic amine, notice they leave this out in the medical printouts for PPD yet this is a major environmental element... guess who is running the industry lol
PPD is an aromatic amine, notice they leave this out in the medical printouts for PPD yet this is a major environmental element... guess who is running the industry lol
For the American-blend cigarettes there was a linear correlation between aromatic amine yields and mainstream smoke tar (tar = total particulate matter - (nicotine + water)), whereas the bright tobacco cigarette and the EHCSS demonstrated significantly lower aromatic amine yields on an equal tar basis. The results support the hypothesis that the nitrogen content of the tobacco, and above all the cigarette combustion temperature, are determining factors for the yields of aromatic amines in smoke. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.--http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/104554458/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Smoking Causes Breast Cancer, Analysis Shows
Certain aromatic amines are known to cause cancer. ... smoke and postmenopausal breast cancer," although the panel can't rule out a causal association.
Gee for my court case, I had collected 3M Filtrettes. These 3M Filtrettes had been systematically applied to a 24" box fan in each room. Pictures were taken of all stages. Where and/or when there was no cigarette smoke (as one of the smokers was away for a week) the filtrette lasted 3 months. (lasted is identified that you hold the filtrette up to the light and can't see through it; it is "exhausted"). Where there was oppressive cigarette smoke the filtrettes lasted all of 3 hours up to 1 week. I put each filtrette in a glad plastic bag and labelled it. I have those filtrettes today and they are in many plastic coverings. I took square inch pieces of such filtrettes to a lab at some steep cost to me. Nicotine was found in the sample. I conferred with 3M and they were surprised I had caught nicotine as they only guarantee 1 and above.
I additionally had an air monitor in both rooms recording directly into the computer the particles that were found, when they were found and how much. On the scale I was living in several hundred over very poor air quality. The New York City Health Department was aware that smokers were in the hallway, elevator, stairs because there was evidence via cigarette butts in these places. I digitally photographed the evidence. There is not one time at which the Department visited that these cigarette butts were not visible. In their forced report they wrote that they saw no evidence. You would have to be blind not to see the evidence. Six witnesses saw the witness. I want to know how much the department got paid to write their careless form letter.
HUD wrote me and verbally told me that I had a case. The hospital records showed that I had lung and pulmonary disease first stage and the proof was on the table that the landlord had not made one visit to the apartment to follow the complaint. In the landlord's reply to HUD they are in contradiction of themselves. Well boys when you lie you should try to keep up with yourself. What did HUD most recently write to me "the case was without merit." The letter before was that in accordance with their mission it was not administratively feasible to take the case. The letter came after two years of them sitting on the case, they had taken it. They had asked me for information and witnesses. They did nothing.
My current landlord agent has written via email that there is no cigarette smoke in the building and if they would the landlord would correct it. The landlord was in my apartment and said I should not be having cigarette in my apartment and they would look into it. Today I pull my clean clothes out of storage boxes with an airtight seal. LOL they are filled with cigarette smoke. I don't even need to have my air monitors of filtrettes. I just send a square of uncolored fabric in any of those storage boxes to the lab and test for PPD and nicotine to make it all simple for the boys downtown. LOL
So guess who the players in my next court case are?