It is clear that fraud was live and well in the court and so it appeared at the deposition with the court reporter very involved in the whole thing.
The most important thing to remember is that the overtenant who always never had money to do habitable requirements and upon one complaint cried out she was having a nervous breakdown, struck again. She said she didn't have any money for settlement and that this case had caused a separation in her marriage. No surprise to me.
I was told to remember how nice she had been to let me stay in her apartment when this flea bag that I'm dealing with now said the apartment wasn't ready at the last minute. She charged me twice the amount that I rented it per day and she took it out of the deposit. She paid half of the interest she was required to. She also paid the deposit back 30 days late. When I first moved in to her place it was found uninhabitable, everything they covered and painted over was quickly uncovered. It took them two weeks to fix it and that is in quotes. I lived exactly two days in the apartment and they charged me $300. I think these people were really nice to me, right.
The landlord's attorney said that all those uninhabitable conditions were not their responsibility but the overtenants. I told them talk to the overtenant because she says those conditions are yours. That is the reason you are in court for negligence. He was disconcerned, put his head down, all out of vindication and went into his office. When I battled the other law firm back they told me to leave, later they told me the deposition wasn't theirs and they would call me in for theirs on another day and they would file a summary judgment on me. I said you have no grounds and you would be way too late. That I have grounds for a motion for mistrial and I'll file that on Monday. He said that now the judge sees that I settled with the Landlord for $2,000 I'll never get anything. I said now the Landlord is out of the way I'll have just you to focus on and I'll really get on your case. The judge asked both of you to have a deposiiton by a certain date as they were a joined party, his date is up. He said all that joined stuff isn't valid. And the judge was so fond of him, after we had submitted and stood up from the table he said oh by the way that he had not submitted his answer to the summary judgment. She grandmotherly spoke don't worry I'm not going to grant it anyway. That statement is entirely fraudulent, the summary judgment was legit. He lost right then and there.
He was losing ground by the half-second. But I pitied him. Get this the overtenant had not paid him, she didn't have any money. He had done much of the work for free. Wow! and I could not get one single person to help me. The help I got I paid $350 for and it was an interview. They said I had a good case but they feared I would end up paying their fees. Lets see their fees would be 1 million and it was unlikely that kind of money would come out of the case. I did not hire them. I asked them how to get out of the case; I was sick of it and it was too much with going blind and not being able to even see the papers, the bed bugs, the broken toilet, the constant smoke in my room, too too much. So he said get the overtenant's lawyer to draw up a release and ask for $5,000. What I gave them was $1500 to be paid to me over six months, because honestly I don't think they'll even do that. They even gave themselves 5 days to cure. The Landlord would pay me $2000 and that would cover HUD and civil court. That was really generous of me, because their response to HUD was strictly up caca creek once I submit an answer. They lied like a silly goose, they mislead HUD, they were facing more than just some dufus physican pawing all over everything but my lungs.
All that money they have offered on the record has already been spent on the copying, the missing days of work to be in court ordered meetings and filing. The point is that its very troublesome that these people got away with this; that I did not make a dent in their breaches. My work was quite good and thorough; the judges were bought; its clear to anyone reading their paper. Doesn't make sense that the judge would state you can renew the summary judgement as you haven't proven anything. I had the 3m filtrettes photographed in stages and tested in a lab and their was nicotine and the colors were characteristic of second smoke. I had the air measured and recorded by computers on a consistent and fair basis without any traffic, away from closed windows.
I had pictures of the inhabitable conditions and all the correspondences that proved I had taken every legitimate step to cure the condition with the overtenant, the city, HUD, government representatives. I had incredible circumstantial evidence to cover the loss of job and the loss of property was self evident. The evidence for negligence was overwhelming. I have the same sort of evidence for the city and I think that would be worth pursuing.
There is no reason why I should have had to do a formal pleading except for a judge who saw one paper and said I order it and all the judges who did not read but listened only to the lawyers and stated I ordered it. Every single cite that attorney used was just slapped on and I found them irrelevant and was prepared to argue. The judge did not even ask me a question.
Like I said don't take your business to civil court in New York City unless you want it trounced upon. You are their customer and you don't have to take anything to them.
Their pro se office constantly gave me bad direction. I brought my complaint to them several times and they never once stated that I could take it to housing court as a condition of habitability. That is exactly what they should have done. Instead they said my complaint form was the only thing allowed to file the suit. That was entirely wrong.
They are to give procedural information and directions to the proper court and they did not do that correctly.
I asked the judge for an injunction and he told me they don't do that there. Wrong, the injunction is done in the same court as the case is submitted. I asked him about poor person's relief and he said just do the best you can. No provisions were ever made, no liberal or leniency whatsoever. A friend told me that if you were a pro se the judge had to be a lawyer. I so LMAO. I straightened her out on that one. The judge gave advice and suggestions to the attorneys but to me she said get a lawyer. A year and a half of being in court and never told that and now you tell me. Last election I voted for anyone running against these guys; however most of them were running without an opponent. Pretty fishy system; hardly a democracy.